KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
We created another .BAT file to open 26 different photos spread across 2 different folders. 18 of the images were of a 14 Megapixel .jpg specification, whereas the remaining 8 were Windows 7's sample images. This represents a real world scenario of simultaneously opening the snaps obtained during a short holiday or day out.
Once again, we repeated the test 7 times and, to reduce the performance differentials due to measurement errors, rounded the stopwatch value to the nearest second.
Performance between the SSD-based systems is much closer once the work load has decreased. Our time measurement method wasn't accurate enough to record a convincing and unambiguous difference between the SSD-touting contenders.
A hard drive's performance is easily surpassed, yet again. For this test, the Seagate Barracuda 7200.12's performance deficit is 75%.
Why do you always review ADATA products? they are nowhere to be found, even if i wanted them.
This is overpriced, so im not interested in a caching drive, not as SSD drive prices are the lowest ever.
Its a nice idea, but its never taken off. SSD prices are really good now. I dont understand why ADATA think this product is worth so much for such a tiny size.
I think its a niche product and its good to see them releasing one. I was concerned about the price and went to look to see if I could find it for cheaper, but I cant find it anywhere, so hard to know if the price is better locally. Not available!