KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
To test power consumption today we are using a Keithley Integra unit and we measure power consumption from the VGA card inputs, not the system wide drain. We measure results while gaming in Crysis Warhead and the synthetic stress test Furmark and record both results.
The results are interesting because the ASUS GTX760 Mini has clearly received some power tweaks, evident by the Furmark result of 224 watts. We would imagine that Asus have increased the power limit of the card so the clock speeds can be maintained.
Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Asus GTX760 Direct CU Mini and HD7850 Direct CU II V2 Review
Tags Asus GTX760 Direct CU Mini Asus GTX760 Direct CU Mini review Asus HD7850 Direct CU II review HD7850 Direct CU II HD7850 Direct CU II V2 HD7850 Direct CU II V2 review Review
Check Also
Elden Ring Switch 2 release slips to 2026 amid performance concerns
The long‑awaited Elden Ring: Tarnished Edition for Nintendo Switch 2 has officially been delayed, with …
The 760 mini is lovely – really nice idea, if a little expensive.
The cards are good, but the cooler on the 760 is too small to really be that good for such a high end board – I would rather get a case that can take a full sized GPU, even if it was small, like a prodigy.
Too bad my three month old Asus 7850 DCUII V2 can’t even reach any core clock over 960mhz without crashing while in a game. Touched nothing but the core clock and 5% power addition.
1000mhz ran fine on tests. rock solid on 3Dmark11 and MSI kompressor though. Could be a driver issue, could be a bad card. Clean install though.
Still, goes to show that overclocking is not absolutely dependable.